Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:59:40 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer <harry@schmalzbauer.de> To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/unionfs union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c union_vnops.c src/sbin/mount_unionfs Makefile mount_unionfs.8 mount_unionfs.c Message-ID: <200702131759.41110.harry@schmalzbauer.de> In-Reply-To: <20070213152252.0E7CB4507B@ptavv.es.net> References: <20070213152252.0E7CB4507B@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Dienstag, 13. Februar 2007 16:22 schrieb Kevin Oberman: > > From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org> > > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:56:43 +0000 (UTC) > > Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org > > > > rodrigc 2007-02-13 05:56:43 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > > sys/fs/unionfs union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c > > union_vnops.c > > sbin/mount_unionfs Makefile mount_unionfs.8 mount_unionfs.c > > Log: > > MFC: New unionfs implementation from Daichi GOTO and Masanori OZAWA, > > which fixes many locking and crashing problems in the previous > > implementation. kib@ helped a lot by eliminating a source > > of deadlocks encountered with unionfs with these commits: > > rev. 1.50 of src/sys/fs/deadfs/dead_vnops.c > > rev. 1.97 of src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c > > Submitted by: daichi, Masanori OZAWA <ozawa ongs co jp> > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.12.8.1 +1 -1 src/sbin/mount_unionfs/Makefile > > 1.20.2.1 +198 -25 src/sbin/mount_unionfs/mount_unionfs.8 > > 1.24.2.1 +108 -74 src/sbin/mount_unionfs/mount_unionfs.c > > 1.31.2.1 +88 -94 src/sys/fs/unionfs/union.h > > 1.86.2.1 +937 -1080 src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c > > 1.76.2.2 +398 -334 src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vfsops.c > > 1.132.2.1 +1879 -1607 src/sys/fs/unionfs/union_vnops.c > > Thanks for MFCing this work and to the authors who put all the work into > actually making unionfs work as it should. As a regular user of unionfs > (at this moment /etc is a unionfs on the system from which I am sending > this), it's great that I can worry less about blowing off my foot if I > am not VERY careful what operations I do with the unionfs filesystem. Full ACK. Thanks a lot, especially to the coders! First thing after cvsup was to patch unionfs, now not neccessarry anymore :) -Harry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702131759.41110.harry>