Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:04:41 -0500 From: Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison Message-ID: <CAGBxaXnLW%2BLYgGS1yAnUFvqZqguhYce4fGw-LkDt2vDCkxixvg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52E7D666.30503@freebsd.org> References: <CADfWLe=zOc2CYRXf8ZuG4uZqN%2BMBck4y1JoDcmrX--JqAgDSQw@mail.gmail.com> <52E7D666.30503@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org> wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe >> you want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of >> sh!t :-) >> > > Looks good to me :) Thanks for running the tests. > > Would you be able to list the command options you used with bhyve when > running these tests ? > > What I couldn't really understand (but that's something not related >> to bhyve or VMWare) is how a multiprocessor machine is slower than a >> singleprocessor machine in doing the compilation... any idea? >> > > Is hyper-threading enabled on your system ? If not, then with a host only > having 2 CPUs and a 2 vCPU guest, there isn't as much opportunity to > overlap host i/o threads with vCPU threads. > Depends on how your setting up bhyve for example PetiteCloud limits it to no more then a 1 to 1 ratio of real to virtual cpu (after playing with something I will be posting about later today [me and Dee have the policy of no pronouncements] I am seriously thinking making this n vcpu to 1 real cpu... what do people think the best way to implement and the right ration for this is...) -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaXnLW%2BLYgGS1yAnUFvqZqguhYce4fGw-LkDt2vDCkxixvg>