Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:44:08 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com>, jos@catnook.com, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Package system flaws? Message-ID: <92474.1026812648@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "16 Jul 2002 11:24:39 %2B0200." <xzpit3g3u08.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpit3g3u08.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: >Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com> writes: >> If libh ever makes it off the ground, you can bet that Tcl will enter >> the base system fairly rapidly since it will be required for >> everything from bootstrapping packages onto the system to actually >> installing the system itself. > >I'm not a big fan of having Tcl in the base system, but - what are we >waiting for? libh should have entered the tree a long time ago, >there's absolutely nothing to be gained from leaving it out in the >cold. It was my impression that we had abandonned the "lets put it in the tree and hope somebody else finishes it" policy long time ago ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92474.1026812648>