Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:49:46 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        Makoto Matsushita <matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>, des@ofug.org, will@csociety.org, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not?
Message-ID:  <3D16265A.3EB9DB6E@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20020621134520.G68827@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020621223209.GP76002@squall.waterspout.com> <xzp4rfv3bbb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020624002649D.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020623124111.C51272@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:26:49AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
> > Current situations:
> >       3) The startx users think that XFree86 4.2 is broken, X server
> >          can't start.  FreeBSD bundles XFree86 4.2.  As a result,
> >          they says "Latest FreeBSD's X server is broken."
> >
> > How to solve:
> >       4a) Write documents, to explain that "startx users should
> >           install X wrapper separately, since sysinstall doesn't
> >           automatically install the wrapper."
> >       4b) Install X wrapper after XFree86 installation is finished.
> >       4c) Add X wrapper itself into XFree86 meta-port.
> >       4d) Do nothing.
> >
> > Current situation is 4d), I propose 4b) in the last email, and some
> > others suggests 4c).
> 
> You will have the same problem with `pkg_add -r XFree86' if you choose
> "4b".  That is why I am opposed to only handling it in Sysinstall.
> 
> In addition to "4c", the granular menu of X bits one wishes to install
> needs to be re-added.  I tried this, but either bugs in libdialog or my
> knowledge of its API caused me to fail in the short time I had to do the
> XF4 changes this before 4.6.

Well, I just fixed a bug in the textbox part of dialog(1), if that helps
you any. :)  I also thought of another point... even if we see using xdm
as a "better" solution than startx, users will still need to be able to
startx in order to get their X configuration nice and tidy before they
try xdm. So, I'm still in favor of installing the wrapper with the X
install. I'd rather educate the few users who know they won't need it to
delete it after the install, rather than take the (legitimate)
complaints from those who need it, but don't have it.

Doug

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D16265A.3EB9DB6E>