Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:27:15 +0200 From: Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz> To: Jonathon Wright <jonathon.s.wright@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transient Memory problem? Message-ID: <5232BE53.4040900@obluda.cz> In-Reply-To: <CA%2B7WWScZB2UE9zM10YGMSGS4t1dat2CN5Eb3BDxKMZbWEFTz5A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGX1DMbQP=TggYQm-3hra0Od3gjgz5xQ8bEMMrueuhL6kuZMUA@mail.gmail.com> <20130912053559.GF68682@funkthat.com> <979901F9-5F25-4DF1-95A8-32473C55B25F@gmail.com> <52320144.2090807@freebsd.org> <CAGX1DMYAheUAV_eB4Z4R_YaMDx_LzrepEag5KyBC=EOxzhUiMQ@mail.gmail.com> <EC4378DB-3AF0-40F7-98BC-0FE6D318938E@gmail.com> <CAGX1DMY=bSpOkzHT=4mYVfSb_tUR6TVTwZqnUcNM-ORa-GBsRg@mail.gmail.com> <201309130040.SAA28208@mail.lariat.net> <CAGX1DMaONPyJ=5yiu%2BFGxa6Q_9WK4hzht7MF5K2%2BCzMWrpfYbg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7WWScZB2UE9zM10YGMSGS4t1dat2CN5Eb3BDxKMZbWEFTz5A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> While the NIAP Web site does not list FreeBSD as a "compliant" >>> operating system product, it lists Juniper routers, which run an >>> embedded version of FreeBSD, as compliant. See > Unfortunately that might just mean that the company behind Juniper has > payed enough money to get their product certified while basic FreeBSD > remains uncertified. Sure. But there are other aspects as well. Juniper's FreeBSD has been verified (whatever it mean in such particular case) as installed inside such router - e.g. version, patch level, kernel compilation options, loaded kernel modules, ... In short, results of security audit of FreeBSD 9.1-R-p2 compiled without if_re module is not applicable to FreeBSD 9.1-R-p3 compiled with if_re module nor to FreeBSD 9.1-R-p3 compiled without if_re module Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5232BE53.4040900>