Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 12:25:33 -0800 (PST) From: "JULIAN Elischer" <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: sos@freebsd.org Cc: jehamby@lightside.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native & Linux ELF support finally there... Message-ID: <199603112025.MAA15472@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199603111731.SAA00731@DeepCore.dk> from "sos@freebsd.org" at Mar 11, 96 06:31:31 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Hmm, depends, from a general viewpoint I'd say no, but.... > If that library don't use any systemcalls directly, but only accesses > them through libc, and we have them in our libc, it might work. > Otherwise its a sure failuremode, as one binary can only have one > systemcall structure (sysentvec), and there is no easy way to change > that. so what are the chages that the libc's are compatible? My guess is about 0%.. just constants to syscalls are probably different enough.. let alone real semantic differences
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603112025.MAA15472>