Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:14:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se> To: "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092110300.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> In-Reply-To: <200404091401.20444.algould@datawok.com> References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092042560.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> <200404091401.20444.algould@datawok.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote: [snip] > > If anyone can shed some light on those matters, then I'm all ears. I can't > > get a new version of Firefox to compile without atk so I'm very interested > > in getting this to work. > > > > I have run 'pkgdb -F' and tried to remove the dependecy, but have not > > succeeded. I'm not even sure it would be wise to do it... > > Did you remember to execute 'pkgdb -Uu' after cvsup and before portupgrade? So be quite frank, I have no idea! I think I followed all instructions quite litterally. But portupgrade was mentioned in the handbook and the "cookbook" examples I found on the web differed somewhat. I no longer remembered if I did a 'pkgdb -Uu' or not. I there any telltale signs showing in the narrative in my first post that indicates I forgot it? Is it recommendable I run it now then? /andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092110300.28354>