Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 19:47:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Loren James Rittle <rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> To: current@freebsd.org Cc: D.Rock@t-online.de Subject: Re: GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken Message-ID: <200205140047.g4E0lgsT063134@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> In-Reply-To: <3CE01A94.9000109@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <3CE01A94.9000109@gmx.de> you write: > found the bug: -Os compilation seems broken with gcc-3.1. I normally > [...] I know any other optimization than -O isn't supported but this bug > (either in libalias or in gcc) should be investigated. I can narrow it down *much* further to exact small test cases. FYI, there are 8 C failures in the gcc 3.1 testsuite for FreeBSD/i386: 4 involve -Os (Quite sorry I never got around to fixing them before the release; I don't usually do per-CPU fixes but I could have requested help from the people that do.) 4 involve -Wformat checking not working in all cases (vfscanf only and then again only when not using the proper system headers; the test cases attempt to declare the prototypes). There are 2 C++ failures (only one of which is seen without linking against -lc_r); neither are extremely important. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-05/msg00412.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-05/msg00458.html FreeBSD/alpha is looking almost as good (more libgcj failures) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-05/msg00455.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-05/msg00425.html Regards, Loren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205140047.g4E0lgsT063134>