Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 05:47:23 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2 Message-ID: <20031206134723.GH75620@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20031206134303.GG75620@elvis.mu.org> References: <20031206134303.GG75620@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok, nevermind, I don't see how 'lo' got used instead of 'lo0' but that's what appears to have caused it. * Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> [031206 05:43] wrote: > Sorry if this is a false alarm, but with the "open" firewall > ruleset in effect: > > # ipfw l > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 65000 allow ip from any to any > 65535 allow ip from any to any > > I can't ping my loopback: > > # ping localhost > PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: Permission denied > > is this known/expected? > > > -- > - Alfred Perlstein > - Research Engineering Development Inc. > - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 -- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031206134723.GH75620>