Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 21:31:34 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, Arjan de Vet <devet@devet.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Has the size of stable /modules increased a lot lately? Message-ID: <20011119213134.C12374@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <p05101012b81f55ec6b33@[128.113.24.47]>; from drosih@rpi.edu on Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:49:49PM -0500 References: <200111192051.fAJKpeY97388@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> <p0510100db81f0f76e712@[128.113.24.47]> <20011119122031.A8371@adv.devet.org> <200111192035.fAJKZu775729@harmony.village.org> <200111192052.fAJKqV775933@harmony.village.org> <200111192228.fAJMSRu98470@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> <p05101012b81f55ec6b33@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:49:49PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > The comments for the commit include "which adds the ability to > compile modules -g as well" (among other things). The original > commit to current (1.241 on Aug 2nd) was a bit more explicit as > to the effect: "When building a debugging kernel with modules, > build modules with debugging support as well". It isn't just > that "the ability" is now available, it's that anyone who has > debugging set for the /kernel *will* also get it for /modules. Personally, I think it makes sense that if the kernel is built with debugging, the modules should as well. All we need is a "heads up" in the release notes (my preference) or in the "updating" instructions. -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011119213134.C12374>