Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:59:19 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tarball releases Message-ID: <20001129005919.A98367@citusc17.usc.edu> In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001128160950.033784a0@mail.etinc.com>; from dennis@etinc.com on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:22:51PM -0500 References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001128160950.033784a0@mail.etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:22:51PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > Wouldnt putting up a compressed tarball of the releases reduce bandwidth > usage (and download time)? > > I know I've asked this before, but it seems logical enough. They're already compressed tarballs. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjokxWcACgkQWry0BWjoQKVbRACfTI6dvcSVmWJ6W20ZphjW6Psa Pw0AoKZYtiXTe0176TEaBN6aqThU9sl1 =yCyL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001129005919.A98367>