Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Aug 2016 19:46:56 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        vbox@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 212128] emulators/virtualbox-ose: Default AIO settings break VirtualBox
Message-ID:  <bug-212128-26505-mrOAthggQp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-212128-26505@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-212128-26505@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212128

--- Comment #2 from rkoberman@gmail.com ---
The use of large amounts of KVM by these AIO parameters is a concern tome a=
nd I
have been testing with more moderate values to see if these make VBox stabl=
e.

I have now reduced the two biggest changes to:
vfs.aio.max_aio_queue=3D8192
vfs.aio.max_aio_queue_per_proc=3D1024

So far, after two days of use, my guest system has remained stable.

I should also note that the maximum number of AIO processes is reduced from=
 32
to 8 which will tend to limit the KVM consumed substantially. I will also be
looking at the 10x increase in process lifetime. It is conceivable that thi=
s is
either critical to working around the problem or is unneeded. Those more
familiar with the inner workings of the AIO daemons might have a better idea
than I do.

I will continue to adjust parameters, but must do that slowly as it can take
some time before the problem pops up depending on disk load (whether from V=
Box
or other activity). I am testing on a older (5 yrs) laptop with an 2.5 GHz
Sandy Bridge i5 CPU and standard HGST disk 1TB disk, so disk I/O will not be
impressive.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-212128-26505-mrOAthggQp>