Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:29:09 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c pkg_create.1 pl.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile delete.h main.c perform.c ... Message-ID: <20040812012909.GA25768@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <8576C147-EBF7-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040811171300.N54010@ync.qbhto.arg> <8576C147-EBF7-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
nOn Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:35:33AM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Before I get a million replies to this commit: When anyone from re@
> thinks it is worth the effort, I will add an -c option to the C
> pkg_version code ASAP. I believe backing this out won't be beneficial
> for -STABLE users, since they'll loose a lot of features (and speed).
> Has anyone on this thread *ever* used that option?
I would like to see the -c added please. I know it seems like busywork
but we have historically tried to make sure existing semantics don't
change in -stable without a really really really good reason. Additional
features (and speed ;-) are always welcome/good as long as existing
semantics don't change. If you need any help or want to discuss it
let me know.
Thanks.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040812012909.GA25768>