Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:37:47 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs article.sgml Message-ID: <20040416033747.GA16273@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20040415205623.GA46098@abigail.blackend.org> References: <200404141231.i3ECVgnb037966@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040415105223.GA771@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20040415205623.GA46098@abigail.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 10:56:24PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:52:23PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > In the text they are used to describe how much space each release, and
> > now the release numbers will be updated without the space requirements
> > being updated per release. Therefor new mirrors cannot easily see if
> > the space requirements are out of date...
> >
>
> I think you are right. Let's hubs people to confirm it and then I'll
> back out the change.
To be honest with you given the ports/ section of the FTP site is
probably an order of magnitude larger than the next largest thing and
tends to have a life of its own we might be best off just putting a
date there instead of an OS revision. The CVS repository is probably
the same - ports dwarfs the mainline system, and gnats/mailing-lists
dwarfs ports. :-)
If you agree I can revise the numbers to current estimates and put
in "(as of April 2004)".
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040416033747.GA16273>