Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:52:25 -0500 (EST)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
To:        peter@wemm.org
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: getsysfd() patch #1 (Re: Virtual memory question) 
Message-ID:  <200301222052.h0MKqP4N041427@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20030122041546.393AF2A8A5@canning.wemm.org>
References:  <200301220304.h0M34TMB099694@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <20030122041546.393AF2A8A5@canning.wemm.org> you write:

>I'd rather do that than add another arg to the memfd syscall.  Otherwise
>we're heading into shm_open() look and feel territory.  Hmm.  I wonder if
>the POSIX folks would object to us calling the syscall shm_openfd() ?

Can you please explain just what precisely your problem is with
shm_open()?  If we're going to reinvent the wheel, please, let's skip
the square and hexagonal stages.

- -GAWollman

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+LwSHI+eG6b7tlG4RAj56AKCFhYoHdkXhvIX1sGPX9PgXB2dttwCgiR75
53DaDGocAf2aI5F7xR09398=
=sswO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301222052.h0MKqP4N041427>