Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:40:29 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 src/etc/mtree BSD.root.dist src/share/mk bsd.own.mk src/sys/modules Makefile src/tools/build/mk OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc src/tools/build/options WITHOUT_ZFS Message-ID: <20070406114029.GE1251@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20070406112944.GD90410@submonkey.net> References: <200704060213.l362DUaW083234@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070406112944.GD90410@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:29:44PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:13:30AM +0000, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > pjd 2007-04-06 02:13:30 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > . Makefile.inc1 > > etc/mtree BSD.root.dist > > share/mk bsd.own.mk > > sys/modules Makefile > > tools/build/mk OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc > > Added files: > > tools/build/options WITHOUT_ZFS > > Log: > > Connect ZFS to the build. > > Much as I love ZFS, shouldn't this default to off, being CDDL'd and all? Don't we build GNU/GPL tools by default? Don't we build GNU/GPL kernel modules by default? The only concern is not to include ZFS into our GENERIC kernel. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGFjGtForvXbEpPzQRAqXuAJ94zeM1ch+N5teBqW92fTb6i+u86wCeImaG +LjNorrpJyFn3rRevuet9YU= =gMHV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070406114029.GE1251>