Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 21:35:52 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: absinthe@pobox.com Cc: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>, shanon loveridge <shanon_loveridge@yahoo.co.uk>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jdk1.3.1p5 Message-ID: <15380.15272.167683.46148@caddis.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20011209223635.A1152@absinthe> References: <20011210001702.10731.qmail@web14303.mail.yahoo.com> <20011210024138.GA3148@gnuppy> <20011209223635.A1152@absinthe>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > that it's not clear to me or that I'm not getting the necessary feedback from > > folks in the community that indicate that native threading is important > > both of these technically and legally reasons from the luke warm responses > > I get from folks. > > > > I can speak only on behalf of me and the companies I try to deploy > FreeBSD at as, in some cases, Java application servers -- native > threading is *Very* important... and further I appreciate all the work > you guys are doing towards this. Why? The native threading that we're using now is no better/worse than the internal green threads implementation. Without kernel threads, native threads have *EXACTLY* the same sorts of problems that exist with green threads. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15380.15272.167683.46148>