Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2018 12:14:01 -0600 From: Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confused about ARM64 cross-compilation Message-ID: <e497c569-20a4-9b66-a93e-1085a3972fc4@denninger.net> In-Reply-To: <1518199819.32585.153.camel@freebsd.org> References: <CAOZdJXXPFfQFGRuFrGHvkmi2wRTDq4ESBPu%2BWxXjzL=a=d3jdQ@mail.gmail.com> <20180209172005.0b787bca.freebsd.ed.lists@sumeritec.com> <2f03b0cc-01c5-950f-026e-4b291117a329@denninger.net> <87fu6am4le.wl-herbert@gojira.at> <65f3f19d-0f87-7f17-99e9-18a538ad0280@denninger.net> <1518199819.32585.153.camel@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] That's what I'm thinking right now too. I'm building the latest-checked-out 11.1-STABLE at present. I have: [karl@NewFS ~]$ clang --version FreeBSD clang version 5.0.1 (tags/RELEASE_501/final 320880) (based on LLVM 5.0.1) Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.1 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin [karl@NewFS ~]$ uname -v FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0 r328086: Wed Jan 17 11:49:06 CST 2018 root@NewFS.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP He is on a later rev of 11.1 from his build rev, but whether CLANG was updated I do not know offhand. On 2/9/2018 12:10, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 11:57 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: >> What is your exact build string for cross-compile? >> >> This is what I'm using (and having fail) early in the cross-tools >> build, >> as the bug report shows: >> >> make TARGET_ARCH=aarch64 SRCCONF=/dev/null __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null >> -DNO_CLEAN -DWITHOUT_DEBUG_FILES -DWITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS >> -DWITHOUT_TESTS -j 12 buildworld >> >> -DNO_CLEAN being gone doesn't change behavior. >> > Since your failure happens when trying to use the 11.1-stable compiler > to build a new compiler, I would suspect the problem is in your base > 11.1 compiler. Maybe H. Skuhra is on a newer revision of 11.1-stable > than you, in which some clang bug got fixed? The output of uname -a > and clang --version on working versus failing systems may contain a > clue. > > -- Ian > > >> On 2/9/2018 11:54, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: >>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2018 15:20:25 +0100, Karl Denninger wrote: >>>> Yeah, for the last couple of months attempting to build -HEAD on >>>> an >>>> 11.1-STABLE AMD64 architecture box fails; the current blowup is >>>> in the >>>> cross-compile tools, so you never get to the actual build itself. >>>> >>>> I logged a bug on this as it's a showstopper for a project of >>>> mine, and >>>> I have no workaround other than to spin up a -HEAD instance >>>> somewhere >>>> (which I assume works, but am not certain it will.) >>>> >>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225521 >>> I am running 11.1-STABLE r328503 (amd64) and build HEAD for RPI2 >>> (armv7) and RPI3 (aarch64) frequently. >>> >>> -- >>> Herbert >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.o >>> rg" -- Karl Denninger karl@denninger.net <mailto:karl@denninger.net> /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ [-- Attachment #2 --] 0 *H 010 `He 0 *H 00 H^Ōc!5 H0 *H 01 0 UUS10U Florida10U Niceville10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1!0 U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 CA0 170817164217Z 270815164217Z0{1 0 UUS10U Florida10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1%0#U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 Int CA0"0 *H 0 h-5B>[;olӴ0~͎O9}9Ye*$ g !ukvʶLzN`jL>MD'7U 45CB+kY`bd~b*c3Ny-78ju]9H euέsӬDؽmgwER?&UURj'}9nWD i`XcbGz \gG=u%\Oi13ߝ4 K44pYQr]Ie/r0+eEޝݖ0C15Mݚ@JSZ(zȏ NTa(25DD5.l<g[[Z arQQ%Buȴ~~`IohRbʳڟu2MS8EdFUClCMaѳ !}ș+2k/bųE,n当ꖛ\(8 WV8 d]b yXw ܊:I39 00 U ]^§Q\ӎ0U #0T039N0b01 0 UUS10U Florida10U Niceville10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1!0 U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 CA @Ui0U 0 0U 0 *H :P U!>vJ n io -#ן]Wyu jǑR̀Q nƇ!G ѦF g\ yLx gw=OPycehf[ }ܷ['4ڝ\[p 6\o.B&JF" ZC{;*o*mcCcLY߾` t*S!(` ]DHP5A~/NPp6=mhk밣'doA$86hm5ӚS@ j ެEgl )0JG`%k35PaC?σ ׳HEt}!P㏏%*BxbQwaKG$6 h¦Mve; [o-Iی& I,Tc ߎ#t wPA@l0P+KXBպT zGv;NcI3&J ĬUPNa?/%W6G۟N000 k#Xd\ =0 *H 0{1 0 UUS10U Florida10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1%0#U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 Int CA0 170817212120Z 220816212120Z0W1 0 UUS10U Florida10U Cuda Systems LLC10U karl@denninger.net0"0 *H 0 T[I-ΆϏ dn;Å@שy.us~_ZG%<MYd\gvfnsa1'6Egyjs"C [{~ _K Pn+<*pv#Q+H/7[-vqDV^U>f%GX)H.|l`M(Cr >е͇6#odc"YljҦln8@5SA0&ۖ"OGj?UDWZ5 dDB 7k-)9Izs-JAv J 6L$Ն1SmY.Lqw*SH;EF'DĦH]MOgQQ|Mٙג2Z9y@ y]}6ٽeY9Y2xˆ$T=e CǺǵbn֛{j |@LLt1[Dk5:$= ` M 00<+00.0,+0 http://ocsp.cudasystems.net:88880 U 0 0 `HB0U 0 U %0++03 `HB &$OpenSSL Generated Client Certificate0 U %՞V =;bzQ0U #0]^§Q\ӎϡ01 0 UUS10U Florida10U Niceville10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1!0 U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 CA H^Ōc!5 H0 U 0karl@denninger.net0 *H ۠A0-j%--$% g2#ޡ1^>{K+uGE v1ş7Af&b&O; .;A5* U)ND2bF|\= ]<sˋL!wrw٧> YMÄ3\mWR hSv!_zvl? 3_ xU%\^#O*Gk̍YI_&Fꊛ@&1n } ͬ:{hTP3B.;bU8:Z=^Gw8 !k-@xE@i,+'Iᐚ:f hztX7/(hY` O.1}a`%RW^akǂpCAufgDix UTЩ/7}%=jnVZvcF<M= 2^GKH5魉 _O4ެByʈySkw=5@h.0z> W1000{1 0 UUS10U Florida10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1%0#U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 Int CA k#Xd\ =0 `He E0 *H 1 *H 0 *H 1 180209181401Z0O *H 1B@Mtk+擵t5IzMHM^^x=+r3b.u|{BѺBU0l *H 1_0]0 `He*0 `He0 *H 0*H 0 *H @0+0 *H (0 +7100{1 0 UUS10U Florida10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1%0#U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 Int CA k#Xd\ =0 *H 10{1 0 UUS10U Florida10U Cuda Systems LLC10U Cuda Systems CA1%0#U Cuda Systems LLC 2017 Int CA k#Xd\ =0 *H q oD] T|] j@m].ùoG:ǽv:G>E ΅\0Q{|䇙{I3X wBI:ehHhTe{*/`([d b6>p)IsUQ&+c{ae-5f" br! ,qe H: 4ӜԒ4z{[gY2=|ҘI "ep;gmrW[̺(k J \ݹ;ZA5X8aAqyΣ r>%3cV/d1 gɕIĹ^:>{тFw=:ξ;70Pm:z]$9 N8&aru=LJҒlc/-"АgGjqӵ#,8k5<:]X.4.QBK#=KzI]jQ*@8help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e497c569-20a4-9b66-a93e-1085a3972fc4>