Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 11:26:21 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Panagiotis Astithas <past@ebs.gr> Cc: java@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@varju.ca, Kris Kennaway <kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <20050528182621.GA64320@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4298B242.5000309@ebs.gr> References: <200505280130.j4S1U6oE050868@8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> <4298B242.5000309@ebs.gr>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:02:42PM +0300, Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >Dear port maintainers,
> >
> >The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
> >LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
> >LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
> >each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports conflict with
> >ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with
> >them.
> >
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Kris "Annoying Reminder Guy II" Kennaway
> >LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER
> >==========================================================================
> >eclipse java/eclipse-devel freebsd-ports@varju.ca
> >eclipse java/eclipse java@FreeBSD.ORG
>
> I suppose another way to solve this would be to modify the eclipse-devel
> port to have a proper PORTNAME (PORTNAME=eclipse-devel) and explicitly
> set the DISTNAME (DISTNAME=eclipse-sourceBuild-srcIncluded-${PORTVERSION}).
Yeah, you could do that too if you want the package to be available
by pkg_add -r.
Kris
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFCmLfNWry0BWjoQKURAgYkAKCZDZHGlkLsB872OoYb/4z0VVbr4QCeMGCd
f6BiTJEubLMFejPWByw4xYc=
=iuGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050528182621.GA64320>