Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:45:55 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@gmail.com> To: Peter <petermatulis@yahoo.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: anyone using portsman? Message-ID: <cb5206420603020145k6940a99pa53b3fcf61aad057@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060302051126.14057.qmail@web60021.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20060302051126.14057.qmail@web60021.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/2/06, Peter <petermatulis@yahoo.ca> wrote: > I'm investigating the ports management utility > "portsman" but the thing seems broken. I just updated > my 5.4 tree via cvsup, fetched the INDEX file (make > fetchindex), and built the INDEX database INDEX.db > (portsdb -u). > > Running portsman I get: > > Checking state of /usr/ports/INDEX-5... > Please stand by while portsman is coming up... > error: INDEX file seems to be corrupted or is of an > unknown format.n? Why would the INDEX.db format be the same for portupgrade and portsman?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420603020145k6940a99pa53b3fcf61aad057>