Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:12:36 +0100 From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: perl@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: libperl stage-qa check and libraries that do not link against libperl.so Message-ID: <868u3nonxn.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <83298B9CC954C7F5642168D0@atuin.in.mat.cc> (Mathieu Arnold's message of "Sun, 17 Jan 2016 21:46:09 %2B0100") References: <86d1t0nu6x.fsf@FreeBSD.org> <83298B9CC954C7F5642168D0@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> writes: > +--On 17 janvier 2016 15:42:46 +0100 Raphael Kubo da Costa > <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > | Warning: > | /wrkdir/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.20/auto/Net/Libproxy/L > | ibproxy.so is not linked with libperl.so.5.20, not respecting lddlflags? > | Error: None of the .so in > | /wrkdir/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/mach/5.20 are linked with > | libperl.so.5.20, see above for the full list. > > Ok, there are two kinds of .so that gets into PERL_ARCH: > > 1) the Perl modules, that are linked with libperl.so, and for which must > have the rpath set to be able to get libperl.so from where it's installed. > 2) The rest of them, they're general .so that do not contain Perl code, and > are not linked with libperl.so. For these, if the non-linking is > intentional, and not needed, ignore the ***WARNING***. Right. If linking against libperl.so and not linking against it are both fine, does it still make sense to have that stage-qa check?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?868u3nonxn.fsf>