Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:20:08 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc.295 stupid.c Message-ID: <20010409132008.A16393@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <200104090948.f399mpE31689@freefall.freebsd.org>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:48:51AM -0700 References: <200104090948.f399mpE31689@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:48:51AM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote: > obrien 2001/04/09 02:48:51 PDT > > Modified files: > contrib/gcc.295 stupid.c > Log: > Well, CVS was being stupid with what it gave me as rev 1.1. Or maybe I > was being stupid for thinking stupid CVS would DTRT. Anyway, this stupid > file is now back to the correct stupid version. And my stupidness in > breaking the build is dealt with. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.4 +271 -59 src/contrib/gcc.295/stupid.c > Of course, you should have checked out the -rFSF revision. :-) 1.1 was only a branch point for the default branch. BTW, I have found that deleting a file (that is on vendor branch) from the vendor branch works better. First, it does not reset the default branch on that file, and this automatically deletes a file from the HEAD branch. Second, it makes `cvs co -rVENDOR' checkout the consistent set of files. : RCS file: /home/ru/Work/.cvs/foo/file.c,v : Working file: file.c : head: 1.1 : branch: 1.1.1 : locks: strict : access list: : symbolic names: : v_1_0: 1.1.1.1 : VENDOR: 1.1.1 : keyword substitution: kv : total revisions: 3; selected revisions: 3 : description: : ---------------------------- : revision 1.1 : date: 2001/04/09 10:12:04; author: ru; state: Exp; : branches: 1.1.1; : Initial revision : ---------------------------- : revision 1.1.1.2 : date: 2001/04/09 10:13:07; author: ru; state: dead; lines: +0 -0 : Remove from default vendor branch. : ---------------------------- : revision 1.1.1.1 : date: 2001/04/09 10:12:04; author: ru; state: Exp; lines: +0 -0 : Import. : ============================================================================= I have asked this question before, but no one answered... Do we have a policy rule for this? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010409132008.A16393>