Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Dec 2001 14:30:48 +1100
From:      Stanley Hopcroft <Stanley.Hopcroft@IPAustralia.gov.au>
To:        isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Router based on FreeBSD vs Cisco Router
Message-ID:  <20011213143046.L48332@IPAustralia.Gov.AU>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am writing with some remarks about the relative merits of a PC 
(FreeBSD based) router and a hardware/Cisco router.

From my limited experience of routers in a medium size government 
business, it seems to me that one should look very hard at PC based 
routers rather than hardware, if one wants a very stable and manageable 
routing platform with a modest number of interfaces.

Cisco routers win in my view with exotic/non IETF protocols and 
(b)leeding edge stuff; they lose as far as stability/maintainability - 
no user repairable parts (replace the box or at least the main board) 
and value for money.

Measurement/deliverable    PC         Cisco   Notes

Flexibility
 . interfaces                         +       More avail from Cisco
 . protocols                          +       This is pretty close
 . integration             +                  eg Snort, argus or ntop
 . Serial interfaces                  +       Must source 3rd party
                                              cards and get them
                                              going. Not too bad.

Performance                NA         NA      No clear winner
                                              (from a non-ISP point
                                              of view) 

Expandability                                 No clear winner.
                                              - PC from ethernet
                                              mem point of view

Value for money            +

Stability                  +                  When Ciscos develop
                                              mem problems they
                                              reboot; hard to fix.

Ease of use
 . OSPF                               +       Pretty marginal
 . NAT                     +
 . Exotic stuff                       +       ISDN/ATM/OSPF over ISDN
 . ACL                     +                  Again, very close.

If you want a modest number of 10/100 ethernet ports - say up to 20 - 
then you could save both bucks and sweat with a PC based product.

Likewise perhaps another good application of a PC router is for
redundant internal default gateways (running VRRP) or likewise at the
border (with BGP) and a couple of serial cards.

If however you want a layer 3 switch, then it seems there is no PC based 
substitute.

Is this generally favourable experience with FreeBSD based PC 
routers shared by others ?

Thank you,

Yours sincerely.



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stanley Hopcroft                                      Network Specialist
------------------------------------------------------------------------

'...No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the
continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a
manor of thy friend's or of thine own were. Any man's death diminishes
me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know
for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee...'

from Meditation 17, J Donne.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011213143046.L48332>