Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:05:42 -0700 (PDT) From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@1command.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind in FreeBSD, security advisories Message-ID: <9b0056db5b760c755dd4acc45bfbd1ad.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> In-Reply-To: <2F6932C3-EF37-49FC-83EE-05512DD5A05C@digsys.bg> References: <CAO%2BPfDctepQY0mGH7H%2BgOSm4HJwhe-RCND%2BmxAArnRxpWiCsjg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFHbX1%2BJyHSPCccmf%2Bhk4C2b8wOcAUvxraFv7%2B04bNbbxbO33g@mail.gmail.com> <20130730.154208.41672901.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CA%2BaY-u7ynASeVdLaJkXDfccb2Jn-X1iqNa1Tw5tx=ino6%2BYdPA@mail.gmail.com> <51F7E292.90608@digsys.bg> <CA%2BaY-u4-%2Bj1sEqj4Bq3qcY9THK5yVr0UYVy2cHrfTQNeD0sAdQ@mail.gmail.com> <2F6932C3-EF37-49FC-83EE-05512DD5A05C@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On 30.07.2013, at 19:49, Peter Maxwell <peter@allicient.co.uk> wrote: > >> I personally prefer qmail over sendmail >> but I wouldn't suggest qmail should be in base for the reason that sendmail >> is the de facto standard on *nix shaped systems. >> > > One can argue that BIND is the de facto standard on *nix shaped systems too. Considering the topic, and how many times it's come up. I'm not sure that's anything to be proud of. ;) > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9b0056db5b760c755dd4acc45bfbd1ad.authenticated>