Date: Tue, 01 Oct 96 11:28:05 +0200 From: garyj@frt.dec.com To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isdn code Message-ID: <9610010928.AA13475@cssmuc.frt.dec.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Robert Eckardt <roberte@mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> of Tue, 01 Oct 96 04:10:23 %2B0200.
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
roberte@mep.ruhr-uni-bochum.de writes: > > > >> Unless sufficient many people come out in defense of the current isdn > > > >> code in the FreeBSD tree, it will be removed because of lack of suppor -t > > > >> from developers. > > > > > > > >What is "unsupported" about it such that it makes you want to remove > > > >the code? > > > > > > Well, nobody seems to use it or support it. > > > > I thought many Germans were using it, since their country has a real > > communications infrastructure, unlike ours. > > YES, I'm using it. (Me too, me too, ... :-) > > I see 2 `standard' applications: [snip] > 2) dynamic syncPPP or X.75 conections -- like our computer center offers. > With the growing popularity (and falling prices :-) things became > interesting to John and Jane Doe to connect to thier providers. > (is/was being worked on, to my knowledge.) > not with the old code. The only development effort that I'm aware of is using bisdn as the base. bisdn != what's now in the tree. I'd like to know just how many people are using the ISDN code currently in the tree vs. the bisdn stuff which is available on ftp://ftp.muc.ditec.de/isdn/bisdn-0.97.tar.gz (or something like that :) --- Gary Jennejohn (work) gjennejohn@frt.dec.com (home) Gary.Jennejohn@munich.netsurf.de (play) gj@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9610010928.AA13475>