Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:45:29 +0600 (NOVT) From: "Maxim M. Kazachek" <stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru> To: Frank Tegtmeyer <fte-sub-freebsd-stable@fte.to> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysinstall options Message-ID: <20030122153548.E54551-100000@sbk-gw.sibnet.ru> In-Reply-To: <m33cnlzggz.fsf@teg.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think that packages from -RELEASE almost always fit to
-STABLE... :-) But I'd rather prefer build software from ports... Have a
good chance to customize it for my needs, not just default settings... :-)
Also, I'm able to build package again after some changes will be made in
port definitions... Look on sysutils/portupgrade tool, which is very
useful to keep installed packages up-to-date with ports tree.
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru
mailto:stranger@fpm.ami.nstu.ru
On 22 Jan 2003, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
>"Maxim M. Kazachek" <stranger@sberbank.sibnet.ru> writes:
>
>> You have "*default tag=RELENG_4" in your stable-supfile? You've
>> upgraded to 4.7-STABLE then... The RELEASE tag is like RELENG_4_7... As I
>> know... (never tracked -RELEASE)
>
>Ok, I don't mind to have -STABLE. The packages are not different
>between -STABLE and -RELEASE, arent they?
>
>One additional question: I saw somewhere mentioned that sysinstall is a
>deprecated tool - what would be the replacement?
>
>Regards, Frank
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030122153548.E54551-100000>