Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:30:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Juli Mallett <juli@clockworksquid.com> Cc: "freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enforcing soft-float. Message-ID: <7272B5EC-FDDA-4C1D-9137-6819F0906FEE@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CACVs6=9oPR0O0M9VorxY6L7xgRn3JBQqwrJ4M4_j9ZELER7Pmg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACVs6=9oPR0O0M9VorxY6L7xgRn3JBQqwrJ4M4_j9ZELER7Pmg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Juli Mallett wrote: > Greetings, people of mips@, > > I think that at least with 64-bit kernels, MipsFPTrap should kill the > running program. Does anyone object to this? The FP code is not even > remotely 64-bit safe. I don't care/dare to correct it. Does anyone? We should kill the offending process if we get a MipsFP trap. I have some interesting in making hard float emulation work, but I'm enotimeish at the moment... So kill them now, and we'll not kill them in the future if Warnerhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7272B5EC-FDDA-4C1D-9137-6819F0906FEE>