Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:27:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se> To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092124210.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> In-Reply-To: <4076F68C.70909@daleco.biz> References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> <4076F68C.70909@daleco.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote: > Andreas Davour wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new > >cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!? > > Because it's a dependancy of about 538 distinct > ports, at least one of which you must have > installed.... > > GNOME, perhaps .... 538!! Well, I haven't installed GNOME, but some other port might depend on some GNOME component, I guess. That sounds like an important port. I don't understand why I wasn't getting it when I cvsup'ed then. Is there a line the the ports-supfile which should read 'ports-accessibility'? Maybe I should add it and cvsup again. /andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092124210.28354>