Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 04:24:18 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: paul@freebsd.org, CVS-commiters@freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc sysconfig Message-ID: <11199.811509858@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 19 Sep 1995 04:12:35 PDT." <199509191112.EAA01836@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Umm, can you back out ALL the changes? I see that you already > commited this one, now we have 6 (counting both branches) commits to > this file in the past 12 hours or so, and we haven't even agreed what > to do with it! :< Woog. This is getting a bit crazy. Can we have maybe just a little discussion before we do *anything* else? I have no fundamental objection to backing these changes out entirely, and will certainly do so if it looks like that's what's definitely wanted, but I'm loath to do even a single additional CVS op at this point until we at least decide "forward or backward". It would only be layering even more craziness onto this situation if I backed everything out and then it was decided to take a route similar to what we have now. I'd have to bring it all back in again. Maybe if I simply remove it from the snapshot? That would, at least, prevent anyone from becoming attached to a feature that might go away. We could leave it in -current for a little longer then, until this is decided.. Foo. Why is it that the 3 line changes always seem to generate the most grief? :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11199.811509858>