Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:30:22 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Current favorite FC HBA? Message-ID: <m3hd1gdwip.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20060716205031.K27056@mgmt.uniserve.ca> (Tom Samplonius's message of "Sun, 16 Jul 2006 20:55:40 -0700 (PDT)") References: <813466C3-8E34-4886-9689-044086F4F64C@dragondata.com> <7376DAAA-4C67-495F-A532-5A86C47E8F75@FreeBSD.org> <7579f7fb0607140806q1cf1baf4q24a6f2ec14118a54@mail.gmail.com> <3B9652BC-027D-4FC5-A2E9-3CD7AF12DC4B@freebsd.org> <7579f7fb0607161131h19a995ffjeceda64feb4d7a7a@mail.gmail.com> <6BF5AB95-9A4D-4ABD-9717-6623F274CFCD@freebsd.org> <20060716205031.K27056@mgmt.uniserve.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Samplonius <tom@uniserve.com> writes: > SAS and 2.5in make a lot of sense for enterprise use. Storage density > has increased a lot, so the extra density can be used to put more > spindles in less space. Why use a 3.5in 10K 146GB disk, when you can > use a 2.5in 10K 146GB disk? Imagine the space savings alone. Not to mention many 15000/min drives have been using smaller disks than their 10000/min counterparts anyways. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3hd1gdwip.fsf>