Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:59:58 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>, Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS bug: was creating ZIL ignores vfs.zfs.min_auto_ashift, should be ZIL sets improper ashift with AHCI controllers Message-ID: <545CB43E.6040901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <545C9552.30207@multiplay.co.uk> References: <B731A922-3F83-4D8E-A4EA-22C5CA8A3850@sarenet.es> <9C91F97841BC4347910F206618BAA3BB9AF327D1@PAIMAIL.pai.local> <545B76EF.6050709@multiplay.co.uk> <21D2A3A9-B6C1-458F-B17F-480251E999AE@sarenet.es> <545BE3E0.4030203@multiplay.co.uk> <757B9039-8DF0-4E6A-A036-82A2143D7F45@sarenet.es> <545C9552.30207@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/11/2014 11:48, Steven Hartland wrote: > > On 07/11/2014 07:31, Borja Marcos wrote: >> snip... >> >> You are right! >> >> This time I had not altered min_auto_ashift but I had added a quirk to >> ata_da.c. So it >> correctly used the quirk sector size to adjust ashift. >> >> Seems the bug should be "improper cache file generation for a pool used for >> boot". I'll >> see if I can run some more tests. >> > I believe the attached is the correct fix, but I've asked upstream as this test > was explicitly added ages ago. It could be that this problem is of no interest / relevance to the illumos upstream as they have more restrictions on how a root pool can be configured. I am not sure if they allow slog devices for root pools. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?545CB43E.6040901>