Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:25:17 +0300 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> To: Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] ZFS feature flag support for 9-STABLE Message-ID: <507D27FD.2090207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <507BC58A.40803@FreeBSD.org> References: <506B4508.3030406@FreeBSD.org> <5077F3DF.2030108@gmail.com> <507BC58A.40803@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
15.10.2012 11:12, Martin Matuska wrote: >>> ZFS feature flag support is ready to be merged to 9-STABLE. >>> The scheduled merge date is short after 9.1-RELEASE. >>> >>> Early adopters can test new features by applying the following patch >>> (stable/9 r241135): >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/9-stable-zfs-features.patch.gz >>> >>> Steps to apply to a clean checked-out source: >>> cd /path/to/src >>> patch -p0 < /path/to/9-stable-zfs-features.patch >> >> Does this suppose to work on i386? On my test machine this gives an >> instant panic on trying to mount root system. I've already rebuilt my >> kernel WITH INVARIANTS, WITNESS and DIAGNOSTIC but it still panics >> even before I can dump core anywhere. I now proceeding to build a tiny >> virtual machine to capture the backtrace. > > I am unable to reproduce this under i386 VirtualBox. Does your system > have some special settings? Was patched stable/9 built correctly? I can't reproduce this either with the same kernel on clean pool. It just doesn't breaks. Looks like rather I've got some problem with my pool. > uname -a FreeBSD limbo.xim.bz 9.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #1 r241326M: Mon Oct 8 05:00:21 EEST 2012 arcade@limbo.xim.bz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MINIMALx32 i386 World is built WITH_CLANG_IS_CC, tmpfs nrbtree patch, CPUTYPE=native. Everything works perfectly in qemu. -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?507D27FD.2090207>