Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 12:10:29 -0700 From: James Gritton <jamie@freebsd.org> To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@freebsd.org> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r340319 - head/usr.sbin/jail Message-ID: <116562006a741fa51ae63d8e9a94419d@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <357a85c0-6552-080f-183c-a1d0d331cfe7@freebsd.org> References: <201811101203.wAAC3vov082259@repo.freebsd.org> <871CB649-7A64-490B-A81E-F68A575A8BA4@lists.zabbadoz.net> <357a85c0-6552-080f-183c-a1d0d331cfe7@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2018-11-10 06:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 10.11.2018 19:12, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> Usually also jls is the command which will give information (compared >> to actions) on jails, would that not fit there? > > jls(8) currently does not parse /etc/jail.conf and I'd like to avoid > code duplication > between jail(8) and jls(8). It's probably time to work on combining the code base for those, and jexec(8) as well. There's been a desire to have jexec work with the jail's fib which is (currently) only in the config and not in the resulting jail itself. - Jamie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?116562006a741fa51ae63d8e9a94419d>