Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:23:08 -0500 From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, Niclas Zeising <zeising@freebsd.org>, current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: drm changes and updating to 12.0 Message-ID: <23520.31868.775969.324314@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoeDcfKMPj6Z2wOZdAR8HX48pC8NmGfGY6uOW9Fr4DBrQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <23519.18601.670359.184297@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <b14d5373-1016-195a-a448-f13f74a4412d@freebsd.org> <CAN6yY1taje760G6CyGcEmTA%2BcNVZJRvdGyhQxtqT%2BKB3LX7AgA@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfoeDcfKMPj6Z2wOZdAR8HX48pC8NmGfGY6uOW9Fr4DBrQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh writes: > I'm curious where 2013 comes from. I know that Intel Sandy Bridg= e graphics > is supported with VAAPI acceleration by drm-stable-kmod, since i= t i working > on the system I am using to send this message. I bought it in 20= 11, the > year Sandy Bridge was introduced to production products. > > 2013 is "five year old hardware or newer". It's a number I pulled ou= t of the > air when trying to nail down the group in describing who should use = what. > Giving code names would also work. Sandy Bridge and newer, though, i= s confusing > to people.=A0 I'd use 2011 as the release date for Sandy Bridge, but= then what > about the AMD other GPUs=3F > =20 > If there's a better way to message what's supported, I'm all ears. =09Lacking a better plan: is there a list of which card/gpu is currently known to work with which drm(-kmod) version, perhaps gathered from those involved with development=3F (Is this based on wor= k from Linux=3F If so, do they have a list=3F) =09=09=09Respectfully, =09=09=09=09Robert Huff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23520.31868.775969.324314>