Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:59:23 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, pav@FreeBSD.org, Marcus Alves Grando <mnag@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/postfix distinfo Message-ID: <433F22DB.5030406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20051001230330.3d2e3aa1@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <200509281902.j8SJ2Fbf043957@repoman.freebsd.org> <0E80A2630461552641F1C3F8@cc-126-240.int.t-online.fr> <1128175185.5849.4.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <20051001230330.3d2e3aa1@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> What's the logic in this ? I should read each commit log for all the
> ports if I don't use the defaults ?
The other side of that is, why should people who have the port installed and
working how they want it have to recompile (or reinstall) to get absolutely
zero benefit? A balance has to be struck somewhere, I am enthusiastically in
favor of being conservative with PORTREVISION bumps.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?433F22DB.5030406>