Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:58:59 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208191355140.91609@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <201208190551.59457.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201208181825.33758.lumiwa@gmail.com> <CAJ5UdcNkN1FYmP7N9mON6=nkw-Su7q=-rReJZ9i9Kwr5jAgH-g@mail.gmail.com> <201208190551.59457.lumiwa@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012, ajtiM wrote: > On Saturday 18 August 2012 21:16:09 Antonio Olivares wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like >>> nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download, >>> please? >>> >>> >>> >>> portaudit -Fda >>> auditfile.tbz 100% of 79 kB 316 kBps >>> New database installed. >>> Database created: Sat Aug 18 18:15:04 CDT 2012 >>> Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 >>> Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. >>> Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/dbf338d0-dce5-11e1- >>> b655-14dae9ebcf89.html >>> >>> Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 >>> Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. >>> Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bfecf7c1- >>> af47-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html >>> >>> Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 >>> Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. >>> Reference: >>> http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/380e8c56-8e32-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html >>> >>> 3 problem(s) in your installed packages found. >>> >>> You are advised to update or deinstall the affected package(s) >>> immediately. Mitja >>> -------- >>> http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> I was wanting to ask this question for a long time, but you have >> beaten me to it :) I was going to ask specifically if firefox does >> depend on libxul that it is necessary? Otherwise, why do we have to >> see this every time we update our ports? I have seen that there's a >> configuration option for libxul so that it can install, but using >> portmaster the option is not the same or not present? >> >> Anyone want to take a shot at explaining this never ending libxul-* saga? >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Antonio > > I think Firefox doesn't depend but I installled VLC player and VLC Mozilla > plugins needs libxul. I used beforeMplayer and Gecko plgins which need libxul > too and because that I switched to VLC because I thought that I am "free" of > libxul but no. > Mitja I have: FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0 thunderbird-9.0 xfce-4.8 xdm-1.1.11 xorg-7.5.1 with no libxul. You can find the 'offending' port by either using pkg_tree or pkg_info -rRx libxul.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208191355140.91609>