Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:02:00 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: fsck_ufs locked in snaplk Message-ID: <444E8E48.8040008@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060425213313.R71240@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060423201732.GA74905@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060424091803.L20593@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424215650.P36233@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424181531.GA13774@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425001751.S44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424202859.GA18457@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425004405.G44618@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060424205026.GA18844@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425134418.J57625@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060425080932.1rv9hq0rcws4wc84@www.wolves.k12.mo.us> <20060425162656.GC54244@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060425213313.R71240@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > KK> OK, I wish you and others had responded to my call for testing a month > KK> or more ago :) All (both) of the responses indicated that the quota > KK> problems had been fixed following changes made then. At this point it > KK> may be too late for 6.x, but we'll see. > > Well, I'm quite sure this change is not too disruptive, and it *does* fix quota > panics, so I hope RE will aprove this (CC:'d) > It would be really embarrassing if quota was broken across two major releases. This has held me back from updating many 5.x machines which require quota. I hope all will be well for 6.1.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?444E8E48.8040008>