Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 20:03:26 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk> To: Brian Buchanan <bwb@holo.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_5: ata interrupt problems Message-ID: <4128DFEE.7030903@DeepCore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20040822095217.K74813-100000@thought.holo.org> References: <20040822095217.K74813-100000@thought.holo.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Buchanan wrote: >>Anyhow I committed a fix for the fake slave problem, now we still have >>those "taskqueue stalled" complaints that I'm still scratching my head >>about and that backstepping ATA doesn't solve... >=20 >=20 > 1.33 of ata-queue.c fixes the problem for me at boot, but I still have = the > "taskqueue stalled" problem after resuming from suspend, as expected. = Let > me know if there's anything I can do to help track that down. Thats what I expected, the "fake slave" problem I knew about, the other=20 is what backstepping wont fix, which hints me that its not nessesarily=20 an ATA problem, or at least not only an ATA problem.. Suspend/resume broke sometime after aug 1st as it almost works (it newer = worked completely on any of my machines) if I backstep sys/dev/acpica &=20 sys/i386/acpica to that timeframe and have the rest of the kernel=20 uptodate... -S=F8ren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4128DFEE.7030903>