Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 05:52:07 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com> Cc: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, <bhlewis@wossname.net>, <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Is anyone else having trouble with dump(8) on -current? Message-ID: <20020813055009.N25992-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020812140551.GC45699@luke.immure.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:16:56PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > [snip] > > > I just saw a reply from the original (?) author of the PR. Apparently > > dump gets killed by amanda. Does amanda actually kill its children > > enough to matter? > > >From my experience/use with amanda I know that it _always_ kills the > dumps that it starts when doing its estimates at the beginning (often > several per file system, one for each dump level it's interested in). I > don't think it deliberately kills the dumps when actually dumping the > data. :-) So the problem seems to be mainly that dump expects all syscalls to be restarted after it catches these signals, and open() isn't restarted. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020813055009.N25992-100000>