Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 03:04:42 +0300 From: Toxa <postfix@sendmail.ru> To: FreeBSD-CURRENT <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and onwards Message-ID: <20041106000442.GA2738@laptoxa.toxa.lan> In-Reply-To: <418C0EED.1060301@freebsd.org> References: <418C0EED.1060301@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 04:38:21PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > So the current plan is to branch RELENG_6 (aka 6-STABLE) sometime around > May or June 2005. That will begin a 1-3 month freeze and stabilization > process for the 6.0 release. After that is released, we will do 6.1, > 6.2 and onwards at likely 4 month intervals. In May/June 2006 we'll > look at doing RELENG_7, or we might wait until Nov/Dec 2006 (12 months Don't you think branching 6-STABLE (and, thus, getting 6.x RELEASEs) around June 2005 is too early for users which may be confused a bit with 4.x, 5.x, and 6.x releases. Now we know 4.x stands for "technologically outdated" but proven stability, and 5.x stands for new technology, new stable branch. In 2005, 4.x won't lost its actuality, 5.x will be in the mainstream (hopefully), and what new 6.x releases will be stands for? I think, there is no radically new technologies, any improvemens from 6-current could be MFC'ed to 5-stable, so why messing with 6.x releases so early? This is just my humble opinion... -- Anton A. Karpov PGP key: http://www.toxahost.org/pgp/pubkey.asc You can finger me @toxahost.org for my current status =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= Hi! I am a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread! =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041106000442.GA2738>