Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:00:53 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>, svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: style(9) changing
Message-ID:  <20130305090053.GG48089@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-FndBvLD_fU1ZZ3cGNtChfdtXyuBRt4Z_ci8daS08ZYdOKzg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201303031339.r23DdsBU047737@svn.freebsd.org> <201303041040.41845.jhb@freebsd.org> <CACYV=-HXz2eaCHkA6MhCR1H1Lb7uyASCQd6k-7zYVa46i%2Bvq-g@mail.gmail.com> <201303041521.06557.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAJ-FndBvLD_fU1ZZ3cGNtChfdtXyuBRt4Z_ci8daS08ZYdOKzg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:41:05PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
A> I wonder how much style(9) can change over the time. Maybe it is time
A> to add/update few rules to better comply with new standard adds.

IMHO, style(9) may and should change. It isn't cast on stone forever.

We should adopt it to C99 at least.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130305090053.GG48089>