Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 21:32:40 +0200 From: Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, ivy@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: epair(4) Message-ID: <45d0f49d-229b-46b4-af95-6e8c4c856661@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <20250515185919.87008219@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <20250515162552.9209B20E@slippy.cwsent.com> <20250515185919.87008219@slippy.cwsent.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
W dniu 15.05.2025 o 20:59, Cy Schubert pisze: > In message <20250515162552.9209B20E@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert writes: >> Over the last couple of days epair(4) fails to set up when an IP address is >> specified. >> >> bob# service jail onestart test2 >> Starting jails: cannot start jail "test2": >> epair0a >> ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument >> jail: test2: /sbin/ifconfig epair0a inet 10.1.1.70 netmask 0xffffff00 up: >> failed >> . >> bob# ifconfig epair0a inet 10.1.1.70 netmask 0xffffff00 >> ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): Invalid argument >> bob# ifconfig epair0a inet up >> bob# >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> >> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org >> NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org >> >> e^(i*pi)+1=0 >> >> >> > This regression is caused by b61850c4e6f6. > > Yes, it requires at least head up, similar to old one, known from fibs : WARNING: Configuring address on bridge(4) member has been turned off by default. Consider tuning net.link.bridge.member_ifaddrs if needed. Looking at my setups used on stable/14 a lot of them will be broken after upgrade to stable/15 by the end of this year. -- Marek Zarychtahome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45d0f49d-229b-46b4-af95-6e8c4c856661>