Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 10:46:31 +0200 From: Giulio Ferro <auryn@zirakzigil.org> To: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 8.0 kmem map too small Message-ID: <4BE13067.1060606@zirakzigil.org> In-Reply-To: <20100505075242.GA57550@icarus.home.lan> References: <4BDEA86E.3050109@zirakzigil.org> <20100503110100.GA93137@icarus.home.lan> <4BDEC106.3040807@zirakzigil.org> <4BE110E3.8040902@zirakzigil.org> <20100505075242.GA57550@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05.05.2010 09:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: Nope, it's happened again... Now I've tried to rise vm.kmem_size to 6G... > Did you set both vm.kmem_size and vfs.zfs.arc_max, setting the latter to > something *less* than vm.kmem_size? > > Yes. After your suggestion, I set vfs.zfs.arc_max: 3758096384 vm.kmem_size: 4G Now: vfs.zfs.arc_max: 3758096384 vm.kmem_size: 6392119296 >> I'm really astounded at how unstable zfs is, it's causing me a lot >> of problem. >> >> Why isn't it stated in the handbook that zfs isn't up to production yet? >> > I'm not at liberty to comment + answer this question. > > Why people responsible for ZFS on freebsd aren't saying anything? What's the status of this issue? Is someone working on this???
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BE13067.1060606>