Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 23:29:23 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: Jack Rusher <jar@integratus.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SANs, disks, & devfs Message-ID: <7888.964474163@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:25:32 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007241419380.15581-100000@semuta.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007241419380.15581-100000@semuta.feral.com>, Matthe w Jacob writes: >Again- I think that this and the full devfs is a usable methodology. I still >would like some feedback as to whether or not linking mount (and mt, e.g.) >with libcam so I can use device VPD info or WWNs would be just too awful for >FreeBSD. This way it can be used now, without vinum. Sounds awful to me, but I guess it depends a lot on the implementation. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7888.964474163>