Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 13:51:26 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org>, Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz>, "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r291741 - head/sys/geom Message-ID: <FBCA137E-227E-407A-833D-584911EEE1FD@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20151205064802.B4095@besplex.bde.org> References: <201512040338.tB43cZY1053263@repo.freebsd.org> <56610B6B.8010708@FreeBSD.org> <20151204233052.J2220@besplex.bde.org> <20151204125355.6712d782@bender> <20151205031713.T3286@besplex.bde.org> <5661E52D.6050305@FreeBSD.org> <20151205064802.B4095@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:42, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote: ... > I wouldn't trust style(9) for anything except simple formatting, but > look at the subsystem(s) style. Just the top level of geom has 11000+ > lines which can be considered as giving about 20 times more examples > than style(9). It would be nice if we had more explicit rules in style(9).. Subtle interpre= tation like this is best left for philosophical and religious texts. The amount of time spent on checking code style (both your's, which is appre= ciated, and others), because style(9) wasn't explicit in areas is time bette= r spent on other things. </rant> -NGie=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FBCA137E-227E-407A-833D-584911EEE1FD>