Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 18:54:24 -0400 From: Damian Gerow <dgerow@afflictions.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: [OT] mutt and PGP Message-ID: <20040704225423.GJ30296@afflictions.org> In-Reply-To: <20040704222507.60EE55D08@ptavv.es.net> References: <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net> <20040704222507.60EE55D08@ptavv.es.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Thus spake Kevin Oberman (oberman@es.net) [04/07/04 18:27]: : > does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt : > won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently : > won't verify the content). : : mutt need to be fixed. I sent this off privately, but perhaps a public statement would have been better. mutt, in its swiss-army ways, /does/ understand inline PGP. Inline signing can be done via the PGP menu in the message details screen -- just hit 'i' for '(i)nline'. Inline decryption/verification can be done by what I believe is the default keystrokes of <esc>+p when viewing said encrypted/signed message. - Damian [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkDoip4ACgkQ28lmlJwisClzKACcDhmD0llry+1ypfWfkUL9yvF7 L3kAn09Fzt+8wpPmgHxmZ+CQJZ8YeNRy =9YxQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040704225423.GJ30296>