Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 17:21:35 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include stdio.h src/lib/libc/sys lseek.2 pathconf.2 src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c src/sys/sys filio.h unistd.h Message-ID: <20070406132135.GA91658@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070406131127.GA91320@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200704052110.l35LAsXH013966@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070406115326.A43678@delplex.bde.org> <20070406053934.GA84722@nagual.pp.ru> <20070406103519.GA1251@garage.freebsd.pl> <20070406131127.GA91320@nagual.pp.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 05:11:28PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > This is not matter of license at all but matter of standards conformance. > > Feel free to invent any other __*_VISIBLE tag to exclude this addition > from namespace for programs which may define their own SEEK_DATA etc > which is allowed f.e. in POSIX namespace. Look like other __*_VISIBLE tags > are implemented and what they does. Default is turn all on. > > In any case adding them to stdio.h is premature action - I not see yet > corresponding fseek() code. To make it more clear, they must be removed from stdio.h (alternative: fseek() must understand them) and tagged as __*_VISIBLE in unistd.h for lseek() -- http://ache.pp.ru/ [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGFklfVg5YK5ZEdN0RAgkUAJ9NhJkY8n+BMGDtmE6vbZuv9gKYLQCgicwz VPyAVvIbRFBndNBCkvoxAZY= =b700 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070406132135.GA91658>