Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 14:59:11 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> To: Milo Hyson <milo@cyberlifelabs.com> Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Specifying jdk for tomcat 4.1.18 Message-ID: <20030322125911.GA740@starjuice.net> In-Reply-To: <3E7A00CA.7060700@cyberlifelabs.com> References: <32007.63.104.35.130.1048109532.squirrel@email.polands.org> <3E78E6C2.2090209@cyberlifelabs.com> <1616.172.16.1.33.1048125648.squirrel@email.polands.org> <20030320020719.GA70161@leafy.idv.tw> <1671.172.16.1.33.1048126904.squirrel@email.polands.org> <20030320041206.GA46244@rcfile.org> <20030320123623.GB54999@starjuice.net> <3E79E8A4.1020302@cyberlifelabs.com> <20030320173304.GT54999@starjuice.net> <3E7A00CA.7060700@cyberlifelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On (2003/03/20 09:56), Milo Hyson wrote: > >>I agree. At the very least, I would expect a FreeBSD port to provide > >>the option to behave like the official stock release. > > > >Hang on, that's not what this is about. > > > I disagree. You're entitled to disagree, but at least take the time to read the entire post to which you respond when you do so. You went on to argue against a point I didn't make. :-) > The original issue in this matter was how to tell Tomcat which JVM to > use (see the subject line). The FreeBSD port works differently than > the stock version released by the ASF. The proposition I put forward would result in the software working very much like the standard distribution, while the additional functionality that several people have requested was made available in a traditional and familiar fashion. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030322125911.GA740>