Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:01:09 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: msk(4) and Yukon FE+(88E8040, 88E8040T, 88E8048, 88E8070) Message-ID: <20090523030109.GE22204@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <200905221314.06146.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20090521041929.GN9043@michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr> <200905221314.06146.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 01:14:05PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 21 May 2009 12:19:29 am Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I had been working on supporting Yukon FE+ for more than a year. > > Lack of hardware and documentation was one of major issue to write > > support code. Recently one user, Tanguy Bouzeloc, submitted fix > > and the patch seems to make msk(4) work on Yukon FE+. You can get > > the latest patch at the following URL. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/msk/msk.88E8040.patch26 > > > > Since the patch changes a lot of code flow of driver all msk(4) > > users would be affected. If you use msk(4) or have Yukon FE+, > > please give it try and let me know how it goes on your box. > > FYI, I am using this on 7.x along with some other patches to get an 88E8072 > working (it's the Yukon Extreme (0xb5) chip ID). I finally got it to AFAIK Yukon Extreme also requires some workarounds for silicon bugs as other variants of Yukon controllers. > somewhat work today (it is having TX issues with TSO and TXCSUM enabled, > haven't figured out which one breaks it yet). When I get 8 up and running I Yukon Extreme uses the new descriptor format, the same as Yukon FE+, so you should have 88E8072 use that. I guess it wouldn't be hard to add support for Yukon Extreme once msk(4) got working code for Yukon FE+. > will send you the current patch I have. > Ok, thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090523030109.GE22204>