Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:35:23 -0700 From: Ryan Libby <rlibby@gmail.com> To: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: ddf0ed09bd8f - main - sdt: Implement SDT probes using hot-patching Message-ID: <CAHgpiFxwZLYUemmWKiYPHvMuLiU7qP_rwFtTKuuGA7pXO9L3tg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ZnmZfLiMQtjPxoDo@nuc> References: <202406192058.45JKwB77036327@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CAHgpiFyVe%2B7PNi%2BsbTz=mOq_2oXOcVsU2o3yqveCMaAACPKD0A@mail.gmail.com> <ZnmZfLiMQtjPxoDo@nuc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:06=E2=80=AFAM Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> w= rote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:36:55AM -0700, Ryan Libby wrote: > > By the way, it seems gcc13 (latest in ports) doesn't support the "Ws" > > constraint. It seems to have been added to gcc 14. I know i386 is tie= r > > 2 these days, and gcc is a second consideration anyway. Trying to test > > out a patch for i386 gcc, I found that it doesn't build currently and > > this is one of a few reasons. > > What happens if "i" is used with gcc? IIRC I had tried gcc+i386 when > testing the patch but the kernel failed to build for other reasons at > the time. Sorry, just realized, I didn't mean to imply this was blocking me. I was able to get far enough through the build to verify my patch and I pushed it already: 88478cc02a20 i386 kernel __storeload_barrier: quiet gcc -Warray-bounds
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHgpiFxwZLYUemmWKiYPHvMuLiU7qP_rwFtTKuuGA7pXO9L3tg>